Monday, November 1, 2010

Fw: Integram Seating in Windsor,Canadian Auto Parts Workers Say 'Enough Is Enough!'


----- Forwarded by Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 11/01/2010 09:17 AM -----
"Gord Gray" <ggray@mnsi.net>

10/30/2010 07:39 AM

To
<Undisclosed-Recipient:, >
cc
Subject
Integram Seating in Windsor,Canadian Auto Parts Workers Say 'Enough Is Enough!'






Published on Labor Notes (http://www.labornotes.org)


Canadian Auto Parts Workers Say ‘Enough Is Enough!’
Howard Ryan
    |  October 29, 2010

At Integram Seating in Windsor, Ontario, which supplies auto assembly plants, 250 members rallied October 27 against employer demands for concessions. Photo: Gord Gray, CAW Local 444.

In a dramatic Auto Parts Worker Day of Action Wednesday, 15,000 members of the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW) staged noon-hour rallies outside more than 100 worksites across Ontario. The action came in response to increasing pressure from auto parts manufacturers for union givebacks.

At one of the larger actions, at Integram Seating in Windsor, 250 members rallied with signs saying “No More Take Backs!,” “Auto Parts Workers Have Paid the Price,” and “If CEOs get a raise, why can’t I?”

The union has already helped the auto industry with concessions in both the assembly and parts sectors, says Gerry Farnham, president of CAW Local 195 in Windsor, across the river from Detroit. “We’ve given on things like health and welfare, and time off the job. But we’re drawing the line. No two-tiering. No wage or pension cuts.”

Preparations for the October action began at the union’s Auto Parts Council in May, with 250 elected worksite leaders attending. “All the auto parts leaders were there. Assembly people too,” said Farnham. “We passed a resolution that cutting labor costs is not the solution to challenges in the parts industry, that we will not accept wage concessions, that we will not put the next generation of workers on a second tier.”

The Canadian auto industry employs 155,000 workers, including 90,000 in the parts sector, mostly in Ontario. “We’re speaking with one voice today,” Farnham observed on October 27, “and that’s unusual in the parts industry where each facility has its own contract, and plants are pitted against each other.”

Auto parts companies are demanding givebacks even while the industry has begun turning around with stronger profits. Parts manufacturer Martinrea, for example, earned $21 million during the first half of 2010. Yet the Martinrea-Fabco stamping plant in Ridgetown, Ontario, with 200 members of CAW Local 127, is demanding members cut pay from around $21 per hour to $14. Local 127 will hold a strike vote meeting October 30.

The concessions being pushed in Canadian auto were ground-tested first in the U.S., with U.S. workers seeing more painful versions. The Big Three automakers GM, Ford, and Chrysler got the UAW to accept two-tier wage schemes starting in 2007, with new hires earning just half of regular wages, and today they are pushing to expand the portion of workers who receive lower pay, as seen at GM’s Lake Orion, Michigan, assembly plant and Indianapolis stamping plant.

In Canada, by contrast, CAW has largely resisted two-tiering in the assembly plants.

What is shared north and south of the border is the automaker pattern of moving more and more work to smaller parts makers, and then squeezing the parts makers to lower their prices—which, in turns, prompts the parts makers to squeeze their workers, and puts downward wage pressure on the assembly plants as well.

The October 27 action day is a powerful first step for CAW. As the union’s national president, Ken Lewenza, commented in The Record, a daily paper in Ontario: “It is likely that in the months ahead an auto parts employer will test our resolve. We don’t want confrontation, but we mean what we say. We will mobilize all our resources to resist employer demands—demonstrations, occupations, plant shut-downs, and refusing to handle disputed auto parts in our assembly facilities.”

   

Friday, October 29, 2010

Fw: Chrysler reveals upgraded 2011 Dodge Grand Caravan


----- Forwarded by Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 10/29/2010 09:00 AM -----
"Gord Gray" <ggray@mnsi.net>

10/28/2010 07:19 PM

To
<Undisclosed-Recipient:, >
cc
Subject
Chrysler reveals upgraded 2011 Dodge Grand Caravan





Last Updated: October 28. 2010 2:02PM
Chrysler reveals upgraded 2011 Dodge Grand Caravan
Alisa Priddle / The Detroit News

Chrysler Group LLC released details of changes to the 2011 Dodge Grand Caravan today in a bid to hang on to its prominence in the minivan sector in the face of competition from a new Toyota Sienna and Honda Odyssey introduced this year.

The Dodge Caravan has Chrysler's new Pentastar 3.6-liter V-6 engine for 283 horsepower replacing three old V-6s.

Advertisement

The new engine is mated to a six-speed automatic transmission and there is a Fuel Economizer Mode that changes the shift schedule for better fuel efficiency.

The suspension has been re-engineered and the van lowered. Lower-rolling resistance tires are designed to improve gas mileage.

The strength of a minivan is the utility of the interior. To that end, for 2011 there is a new one-piece instrument panel with larger gauges and a new center console for storage and an area for large items such as a purse.

The Stow 'n Go seats are more comfortable and can be operated with a one-touch button.

The Grand Caravan introduces a heated steering wheel to the segment.

Safety features include a rear park-assist system and backup camera as well as blind-spot monitoring and a system that detects vehicles crossing the van's path from behind.

There is a new front fascia, grille, hood and quad headlights to make it look more aggressive than its Chrysler Town & Country counterpart. In back there is a new rear fascia, liftgate and LED taillamps.

For 2011 there are four trim levels of Grand Caravan. The Express, Mainstreet and Crew go on sale this quarter and the R/T — dubbed the "man van" — follows next spring.

The minivans are built at the assembly plant in Windsor, Ontario.



From The Detroit News:
http://detnews.com/article/20101028/AUTO01/10280469/1148/Chrysler-reveals-upgraded-2011-Dodge-Grand-Caravan#ixzz13hMvON6e  

Monday, October 25, 2010

Fw: Fiat's Italian Business Still Unprofitable in 2010, Marchionne Says


----- Forwarded by Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 10/25/2010 04:47 PM -----
"Gord Gray" <ggray@mnsi.net>

10/24/2010 07:41 PM

To
<Undisclosed-Recipient:, >
cc
Subject
Fiat's Italian Business Still Unprofitable in 2010, Marchionne Says






 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-24/fiat-s-italian-business-still-unprofitable-in-2010-marchionne-says.html
Fiat's Italian Business Still Unprofitable in 2010, Marchionne Says
By Marco Bertacche - Oct 24, 2010

Fiat SpA Chief Executive Officer Sergio Marchionne said the Italian carmaker’s domestic business will still be unprofitable this year.

Fiat on Oct. 21 raised its target for 2010 earnings before interest, taxes and one-time items to at least 2 billion euros.

“None of those earnings will be made in Italy,” Marchionne said in Milan in an interview with state television RAI. “We still have a loss.”

Marchionne was commenting on the carmaker’s measures to raise productivity at Italian plants. Fiat plans to invest 20 billion euros through 2014 in Italy to improve plants and vehicle development if unions agree to curb strikes and add shifts.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Marco Bertacche at mbertacche@bloomberg.net  

Friday, June 11, 2010

Fw: A message from Sergio Marchionne


----- Forwarded by Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 06/11/2010 07:07 AM -----
Chrysler Comm

06/11/2010 05:36 AM

To
Chrysler Employees and Contractors
cc
Subject
A message from Sergio Marchionne




Dear Colleagues,

Today marks the first day of our second year as a new company. Chrysler Group LLC in fact began operations on June 10, 2009, and when I met with you on that day, I expressed confidence that Chrysler would once again be a strong and competitive carmaker.

Crisis can bring out the best in a company and its people. Rather than yield to pessimism, our organization has moved forward with a renewed sense of purpose to succeed. Through hard work and tough choices, we made significant progress during the past 365 days. Among the highlights:
  • Last November we publicly revealed an ambitious but achievable five-year plan for rebuilding our portfolio of products and achieving sustainable profitability
  • Our alliance with Fiat is taking root, making us part of a strong global team with the critical mass needed to achieve significant economies of scale, fully exploit the related synergies and expand our geographic presence.
  • We ended the first quarter of 2010 with an operating profit of $143 million, with major factors being price discipline, the launch of the all-new Ram Heavy Duty pickup (Motor Trend’s “Truck of the Year”) and overall reduced costs.
  • We are generating the cash needed to build our brands and invest in products, such as the 16 all-new or refreshed vehicles that will be introduced by the end of this year, representing 75 percent of our product line.
  • Our sales are building momentum, with substantial year-over-year increases in the past two months.
  • Our powertrain initiatives are intensifying. The Trenton South Engine Plant has begun building the all-new, state-of-the-art Pentastar V-6engine. In the fourth quarter, the GEMA Plant in Dundee will start producing the 1.4 liter Fully Integrated Robotized Engine (FIRE), which includes Fiat’s innovative advanced technologies to improve fuel economy.
  • In May, we began production of the all-new 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee at the Jefferson North Assembly Plant. We are adding a second production shift to meet expected strong demand for this new vehicle, which has already earned “Top Safety Pick” status from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The launch also highlights the enterprise-wide rollout of the World Class Manufacturing system, which represents a step change in our commitment to quality.

There is still a very long road ahead in our drive to rebuild our business and to deliver on our promises to repay the American and Canadian taxpayers who gave us a second chance. And we do this in recognition of the commitment made by the UAW and CAW.

This one-year anniversary represents a significant milestone.

I want to express my sincere appreciation for all your efforts in the past 12 months.  We have all done a lot, and a lot more needs to get done.

Let’s continue to stay focused and move forward on the path we have set.

Thank you.

Sergio Marchionne  

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Fw: May U.S. sales jump 33 percent, top 100,000 units


----- Forwarded by Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 06/03/2010 09:41 AM -----
scoop@chrysler.com

06/02/2010 12:28 PM

To
Chrysler Employees and Contractors
cc
Subject
May U.S. sales jump 33 percent, top 100,000 units




Scoop to Go
Breaking news for Chrysler Group Employees and Retirees

May U.S. sales jump 33 percent, top 100,000 units

Chrysler Group LLC today reported a U.S. sales increase of 33 percent for May 2010, the second consecutive year-over-year percentage sales improvement, and the first time that monthly sales have topped the 100,000 threshold since March 2009.

The Chrysler Group reported total U.S. sales for May of 104,819 units, an increase of 33 percent versus May 2009. Sales increased 10 percent compared with April 2010.

“The company continues to show improvement each month, with May being our strongest month this year, exceeding overall industry growth for the second month in a row,” said Fred Diaz, President and CEO—Ram Truck Brand and Lead Executive for U.S. Sales.

The full report on May's U.S. sales can be found on The Scoop at http://scoop.chrysler.com/2010/06/02/may-u-s-sales-jump-33-percent-tops-100000-units/

Canadian sales jump 53 percent in May

Chrysler Canada reported a 53 percent sales increase Tuesday, compared with May 2009, with 20,887 units sold.

For calendar year 2010 to date, Chrysler Canada sales are 28 percent ahead of last year's level. For the sixth consecutive month, retail sales increased more than 20 percent.

Four Chrysler Canada vehicles recorded their best-ever May sales results: Dodge Journey, Ram pickup, Jeep(get that r symbol in here please)  Wrangler, and Dodge Challenger.

The full report on Canada sales for May can be found on The Scoop at http://scoop.chrysler.com/2010/06/02/canadian-sales-jump-53-percent-in-may/  

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Fw: Strong dealer orders prompt 2nd shift for new Jeep Grand Cherokee


----- Forwarded by Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 05/26/2010 09:41 AM -----
"Gord Gray" <ggray@mnsi.net>

05/22/2010 08:52 AM

To
<Undisclosed-Recipient:, >
cc
Subject
Strong dealer orders prompt 2nd shift for new Jeep Grand Cherokee





 


Strong dealer orders prompt 2nd shift for new Jeep Grand Cherokee
Bradford Wernle
Automotive News |
 UPDATED: 5/21/10 6:53 p.m. ET
DETROIT -- Dealer orders for the redesigned 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee have exceeded expectations by about a third -- a key factor in Chrysler Group's decision to add a second shift to its Jefferson North Assembly Plant here.

Chrysler will hire an additional 1,080 workers for the second shift, which starts July 19, CEO Sergio Marchionne said today at the production launch ceremony for the vehicle. The plant already employs 1,700.

“Initial orders are 30-40 percent higher than initial expectations,” Jeep brand CEO Michael Manley said on the sidelines at the ceremony. Chrysler declined to say what their volume expectations were for the vehicle.

Jeep sold 50,328 Grand Cherokees in 2009, down 32 percent from the previous year. Sales have declined along with sales in the SUV segment in general.

In 1999, Grand Cherokee sales peaked at 300,031.

Chrysler will begin building another vehicle at the factory in the fourth quarter. The vehicle will carry the Dodge brand, will have seven seats and will replace the Durango SUV in the Dodge lineup. The Grand Cherokee has five seats.

Major plant improvements

Chrysler has invested $686 million in the Grand Cherokee program, including a new body shop.

Marchionne hailed the 2011 Grand Cherokee as "the rebirth of the Chrysler Group."

He drew a standing ovation from assembled workers and dignitaries at the plant. The Italian-Canadian executive made a dramatic entrance to the factory ceremony, driving a silver Grand Cherokee to the front of the stage with Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm as a passenger.

Although the Grand Cherokee program was already in the works when Fiat took management control of Chrysler, Fiat S.p.A. already has brought major changes to Chrysler's manufacturing culture.

Employees at the plant have received 44,000 hours of training in Chrysler's World Class Manufacturing process, developed by Fiat as a version of Toyota's lean manufacturing system.

Marchionne said the system "is intended to put dignity into the workplace" by giving workers a greater role in shaping their jobs.

"The workplace should be a place that you can be proud of, that you can take your kids to and show them where you work, and that will reflect fundamental values of human self-respect," he said. "That's why WCM is such an agent of change."

Among the innovations Fiat has brought is a gauge called the Meisterbock, which allows Chrysler engineers to closely measure tolerances to see how parts will go together in the body shop before they go onto the line.

"We found some parts that were out of conformation and had suppliers take them back to the drawing board," said Trajche Sekuloski, a plant employee. Chrysler couldn't have anticipated these problems previously, he said.

Premium SUV


Jeep wants the Grand Cherokee to move upscale in every area but price. The premium Overland version will sell for $42,995, including shipping.

Chrysler is launching the vehicle in three models: Overland, Limited and Laredo. The company is following its recent policy of offering more features at a slightly lower price than the previous model.

The Overland features wood and leather accents geared to the luxury segment, including a wood-trimmed steering wheel.

Two engine options will be offered. The new Grand Cherokee will be the first Chrysler vehicle to come with the company's 3.6-liter V-6 Pentastar engine, which will crank out 290 hp. With the V-6, the four-wheel-drive version gets 23 mpg and has a 500-mile cruising range.

Phil Jansen, chief engineer on the program, said Chrysler anticipates that 75 percent of all Grand Cherokees will be sold with the V-6, up from 60 to 65 percent with the current model. The current Grand Cherokee V-6 only generates 210 hp.

Also offered will be a Hemi V-8. Both engines are mated to existing five-speed automatic transmissions.

Shared Mercedes components

The Grand Cherokee started development when Daimler still owned Chrysler Group. It shares components with the Mercedes-Benz M class.

Jansen said the Grand Cherokee shares suspension components and a steering column with the Mercedes models. But the Jeep features a suite of new off-road systems that are completely different, including a QuadraLift suspension that allows the driver to adjust the height of the body depending on conditions.

"What they [Mercedes] want to do and what we want to do is totally different based on our brand" regarding off-road capability, Jansen said.

For the first time, the Grand Cherokee has independent front- and rear axles for better on-road performance, Jansen said.

The Grand Cherokee was designed so it could pass emissions and safety regulations around the world. The vehicle will be sold in 105 countries, Jansen said. Right-hand-drive versions will go into production this year.

Chrysler plans to make all Grand Cherokee models in Detroit. In the past, the company manufactured European versions at a factory in Graz, Austria.

 

 


 

Fw: CDLC Labour Day BBQ Invitation


----- Forwarded by Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 05/26/2010 09:40 AM -----
"Todd Romanow" <Todd.Romanow@caw.ca>

05/25/2010 03:33 PM

To
undisclosed-recipients:;
cc
Subject
FW: CDLC Labour Day BBQ Invitation





 
 



From: Calgary and District Labour Council [mailto:admin@thecdlc.ca]
Sent:
Tuesday, May 25, 2010 3:19 PM
To:
undisclosed-recipients
Subject:
CDLC Labour Day BBQ Invitation

 

Regarding the CDLC Labour Day BBQ, please see the attached letter of invitation and poster.
Your support is greatly appreciated to make this year's event a great success.


--
Calgary and District Labour Council
321, 3132 26 Street NE
Calgary, Alberta T1Y 6Z1
E: admin@thecdlc.ca
T: 403 262 2390
F: 403 262 2408
W: www.thecdlc.ca
 
   

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Fw: Government auto stake could leverage benefits: Ken Lewenza


----- Forwarded by Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 05/18/2010 07:04 AM -----
"Gord Gray" <ggray@mnsi.net>

05/18/2010 04:41 AM

To
<Undisclosed-Recipient:, >
cc
Subject
Government auto stake could leverage benefits: Ken Lewenza





Government auto stake could leverage benefits: Ken Lewenza
By Ken Lewenza, Special to The Windsor Star May 17, 2010
 
 

 
Canadian Auto Workers Union President Ken Lewenza.
Photograph by: Rebecca Cook, Reuters

GM's recent announcement that is has fully repaid the loans it received from the U.S., Canadian and Ontario governments (years ahead of schedule, and with interest) was another positive sign of the auto industry's gradual recovery. The loan repayment reaffirms the strategy that our governments followed at the time of last year's meltdown.

Government inaction at that time would have resulted in the collapse of GM and Chrysler, the loss of tens of thousands of crucial jobs, and billions of dollars in additional expense for governments.

Some commentators argued at the time that governments should stay out of the picture, and let the companies collapse (presumably to be magically replaced by new jobs rising from the ashes). Now that the money is being repaid, the folly of that view is being proven. It turns out the government involvement was a good investment, not a "bailout."

The most important legacy of last year's rescue is the jobs and communities which have been strengthened by the preservation of key plants and jobs, including the tens of thousands of spinoff jobs.

By keeping so many Canadians working, and paying taxes, the rescue effort was essential.

The repayment of the GM loans, and the profits now being reported by both GM and Chrysler, have whetted the appetites of some observers for government to dispose of its remaining stake in the two companies.

The loans which GM repaid were a small share of total government support to the firm; the rest was in the form of equity. The U.S., Canadian, and Ontario governments are also the major equity owners of Chrysler. What should be done with those shares in the long run, as the companies gradually regain their footing?

The conventional business view, echoed in a recent Windsor Star editorial (Auto Shares: Taxpayers Have Done Their Part, May 7), is that government should dispose of its shares as soon as possible.

By exiting the industry, government would then leave all the decisions up to the profit-maximizing judgments of auto industry executives and the investors they work for.

Underlying this view is the assumption that private investors know better than government how to run the industry. But is this assumption that "private knows best" really valid?

No, it isn't. If private investors indeed make rational, efficient decisions, how did we end up in last year's crisis in the first place?

In my view, government participation in the future actions of these companies, through a continuing equity stake, would help to ensure that they act in the best long-run interests of all of society, rather than once again pursuing short-term profits regardless of the economic and social consequences.

There are many examples in the global auto industry of the beneficial role of minority public ownership in stabilizing automakers and grounding them better in the economies where they are based. Volkswagen is arguably the most successful automaker in the world today and is part-owned by the state government in Lower Saxony, where the company had its origins.

That public ownership stake has been used to leverage a continuing commitment by VW to a strong German presence, despite Germany's high labour costs. Government officials don't get involved in day-to-day decision-making, but the company knows it has a responsibility to German society.

Public investment is also important in the French, Korean and Japanese auto industries. In most of the world, in short, government investment still plays an important role in the auto industry. In all cases, the companies operate on a global scale, and make decisions that are often painful or controversial.

But minority public ownership stabilizes the companies in the face of volatile market and financial swings, and cements their "home-field advantage" in the countries where they were founded.

Canada is the only G-8 economy which does not have a single "home-grown," domestically based auto company.

Over the years we've managed to attract foreign investment and leverage those investments into spinoff jobs and a state-of-the-art supply base. But we're still vulnerable, lacking a direct ownership stake in the assembly industry.

It's very ironic that The Star editorial quoted so approvingly from the words of Steve Rodgers of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers' Association. He supports a quick sale of the public stake, assuming that private industry will automatically find specific products which Canada can produce competitively.

Yet Rodgers own industry is proof positive that Canada can never count on automatic competitiveness. The autoparts industry has shed 40 per cent of its jobs (a terrible toll of 40,000 lost positions) since 2004. And there's no sign of turnaround.

To me that's a sure sign that Canada can't take anything for granted in the auto industry.

Last year's dramatic events have finally given Canadians a direct ownership stake in the auto industry.

Instead of selling off that stake at the first opportunity, we should learn from the experience of the rest of the world. A continuing public ownership stake would help us maximize the Canadian presence of this industry in the years to come.

That would be good not just for auto communities. It would be good for Canadian taxpayers, who will attain the biggest payoff for the money that they have invested.

Ken Lewenza is national president, CAW-Canada.

© Copyright (c) The Windsor Star  

Fw: Lack of buying power could leave you paying more for drugs


----- Forwarded by Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 05/18/2010 07:03 AM -----
"Gord Gray" <ggray@mnsi.net>

05/18/2010 05:01 AM

To
<Undisclosed-Recipient:, >
cc
Subject
Lack of buying power could leave you paying more for drugs






Back to Daw: Lack of buying power could leave you paying more for drugs
Daw: Lack of buying power could leave you paying more for drugs

May 18, 2010, James Daw

Ontario has moved to force down generic drug prices, while leaving pharmacies to recover lost revenue elsewhere.

That could leave consumers and sponsors of private drug plans paying more for dispensing fees, patented drugs and other services.

Meanwhile, another shoe is about to drop that could further exaggerate differences in prices and fees depending on who is paying.

A coalition is forming so sponsors of private drug plans can better use their buying power to negotiate lower prices, and also to save money through better management of drug use by employees.

It’s still early days, but the major consulting company behind the idea expects to sign up dozens of large companies in the next few weeks.

“Most employers in Canada don’t manage the price file of the drugs,” says Wendy Poirier, director of the health and group benefits practice for Towers Watson in Canada.

They hire an insurance company that earns an administrative fee to manage medical and drug plans. The insurer makes sure no employee gets more than his or her entitlement, but does not necessarily negotiate prices or monitor whether one pharmacist is charging $150 while another is charging $100 for the same drug, says Poirier.

“But, of course, Ontario regulates what it will pay for drugs for its plans (for seniors, the poor, patients in hospitals and those with dread diseases like cancer). Then the teeter-totter goes up somewhere else, because pharmacies strive to make a profit.”

Towers Watson, the consulting company formed from the recent merger of Towers Perrin Forster & Crosby Inc. and Watson Wyatt Worldwide Inc., brings seven years of experience with a buying coalition in the United States.

In the United States it works with more than 130 U.S. companies that pay about $2.8 billion for drugs for more than 2 million employees and retirees.

In Canada, Poirier says her company has been working with 12 companies that spent $150 million for drugs in 2009, and with Green Shield Canada, to develop the structure for negotiating and monitoring drug prices through the new Canadian Rx Coalition.

None of these dozen companies has yet to join the coalition, however. The formal invitation to join went out late last week, and the consultants are waiting for a response.

Towers Watson promises the coalition members will get more information than they now receive about the terms of pricing deals with drug suppliers and pharmacies.

They will get step-by-step advice on managing drug utilization, serving members with diseases and selecting the list of generic and patented drugs their plans will cover, as provinces do.

Controlling costs, says Poirier, should help companies avoid having to reduce their group medical coverage in the face of ever-rising prices.

Drugs now account for about 70 per cent or about $14 billion of the cost of employer-sponsored medical plans in Canada, according to Towers Watson. Prices more than doubled in the past decade, rising faster than government budgets for drugs.

A company called Telus Health Solutions, a subsidiary of the telephone system operator that offers technology for prescription payments, set a maximum dispensing fee on behalf of companies whose drug plans are run by various insurers.

But some pharmacists charge more, and more may in future. Towers Watson points out in a slide presentation that some pharmacies refused to dispense drugs or charge drug plans when the Canadian Auto Workers union negotiated discounted prices with some brand-name drug makers.

Poirier promises companies that join the new coalition will receive full disclosure about the terms of pricing deals from Green Shield Canada.

There is no guarantee the coalition will succeed. But if the consortium idea does succeed, and other similar purchasing groups emerge, then consumers left out of a drug plan or a coalition could see higher prices.

 

Monday, May 17, 2010

Fw: Job Postings: ALBERTA FEDERATION OF LABOUR


----- Forwarded by Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 05/17/2010 01:36 PM -----
"Todd Romanow" <Todd.Romanow@caw.ca>

05/17/2010 11:51 AM

To
undisclosed-recipients:;
cc
Subject
Job Postings:  ALBERTA FEDERATION OF LABOUR






Greetings All,

As you know the AFL has been working toward filling positions vacated
last fall. We have advertised and will fill two positions, hopefully in
the next few weeks.

I am attaching the job posting and would ask that you give it your
widest possible distribution.

Thanks in advance


 

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Fw: Chrysler Group announces U.S. pricing for new 2011 Jeep® Grand Cherokee.


----- Forwarded by Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 05/13/2010 07:12 AM -----
scoop@chrysler.com

05/12/2010 10:31 AM

To
Chrysler Employees and Contractors
cc
Subject
Chrysler Group announces U.S. pricing for new 2011 Jeep® Grand Cherokee.




Scoop to Go
Breaking news for Chrysler Group Employees and Retirees

Pricing for the all-new 2011 Jeep® Grand Cherokee Laredo 4x4 will start at a U.S. Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) of $32,995.  link to article on scoop

Completely redesigned and re-engineered, the all-new 2011 Grand Cherokee will be built at the Jefferson North Assembly Plant in Detroit, which went through a complete transformation as part of implemention of the company’s World Class Manufacturing process.

 “The new Jeep Grand Cherokee delivers a unique blend of capability, refinement, features and amenities that no other manufacturer can offer, all at a great price,” said Mike Manley, President and CEO—Jeep Brand.

The all-new Grand Cherokee, available in three models - Laredo, Limited and Overland, will arrive in Jeep showrooms in June.

http://scoop.chrysler.com/2010/05/12/pricing-announced-for-all-new-grand-cherokee/  

Fw: 2010 Red Deer & District Labour Council Essay Contest Scholarship Poster


----- Forwarded by Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 05/13/2010 07:11 AM -----
"Todd Romanow" <Todd.Romanow@caw.ca>

05/12/2010 12:00 PM

To
undisclosed-recipients:;
cc
Subject
FW: 2010 Red Deer & District Labour Council Essay Contest Scholarship Poster





 
FYI,
 
If you know anyone in Red Deer Alberta who may have children wanting to attend post secondary, please forward this scholarship offer to them.  Thanks
 
 
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 4:55 PM
Subject: 2010 Red Deer & District Labour Council Essay Contest Scholarship Poster
 
Greetings Sisters & Brothers,
 
Please find attached the poster for the Labour Council's Annual Essay Contest Scholarship.
 
Please pass this on to your contacts, post at your workplace, spread the word far and wide.
 
If you need paper copies, let me know by email and I will send some to you.  
 
Thank you
Karen Reay
Secretary
Red Deer & District Labour Council  

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Fw: Prescription for disappointment: Inside a city pharmacy


----- Forwarded by Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 05/04/2010 07:11 AM -----
"Gord Gray" <ggray@mnsi.net>

05/01/2010 06:11 AM

To
<Undisclosed-Recipient:, >
cc
Subject
Prescription for disappointment: Inside a city pharmacy






Back to Prescription for disappointment: Inside a city pharmacy
Prescription for disappointment: Inside a city pharmacy

May 01, 2010

Dana Flavelle

Neil Bornstein, owner of independent West Hill Pharmasave in Scarborough, Ont., with customer Norma Tuttle.

COLIN MCCONNELL/TORONTO STAR

It’s just after 10 in the morning when a couple of regulars drop by the West Hill Pharmasave in Scarborough to pick up their prescriptions.

Owner-pharmacist Neil Bornstein is steering retired nurse Norma Tuttle toward the cheaper private label brand of baby aspirin while summoning a staff member to address a problem with her Glucometer, a device that measures blood sugar levels.

“I come here because he knows me,” Tuttle, 70, says of Bornstein. “I want my pharmacist to know my name.”

Bornstein says a lot of people choose to deal with independents because he may not be able to provide that level of personal service in future under the province’s proposed drug reforms.

The Ontario government plans to slash $750 million in professional allowances pharmacists receive from generic drug makers, part of a plan to cut the price of those drugs in half.

The cuts, which the government says will bring Ontario’s drug prices in line with other jurisdictions, will hit pharmacies across the province, whether they’re independently owned, part of a national chain, or housed in supermarkets or discount department stores.

The industry says independents like Bornstein, who account for 51 per cent of the Ontario market, will be hit hardest.

That’s why Bornstein agreed to open his books to explain how the drug plan will hurt his business – and his customers.

Sitting in the patient consulting room in the newly renovated pharmacy he bought 20 years ago, Bornstein says he is $400,000 in debt. His revenue last year was $2.5 million. But after paying himself, his staff, his rent, utilities and other expenses, the store cleared just $30,000 in profit.

That’s all going back into the business, to pay down his debt and upgrade computer equipment. “It’s not going to buy a boat.”

His biggest expense is labour. He declined to say how much he pays himself. A survey in 2006 found pharmacist-owners in Ontario paid themselves the same hourly rate as they paid their staff pharmacists. The owner could also pay him or herself a dividend out of profits, if any.

The cost of becoming a pharmacist is at least $77,000, the association said, once you factor in six years in school, plus textbooks and licensing fees.

Bornstein employs 15 people, including two other pharmacists and four technicians. A pharmacist in Toronto earns $45 to $50 an hour on average, or nearly $100,000 a year. Technicians earn less than half that, or $16 to $20 an hour, he says.

Under the government’s drug reform plans, the average pharmacy will lose $300,000 – roughly 10 per cent – of its annual revenue, the Ontario Pharmacists Associations says.

That’s more than they earned last year. Average net profit at an Ontario drug store was $204,000 on sales of $3.2 million, according to Community Pharmacy 2009, an annual survey of the industry.

The impact varies with the size of the drug store and its clientele. Bornstein’s profits were lower last year because he renovated his store. But even in a good year, his store earns between $60,000 and $80,000 in profit.

“With a major business focus on long-term care, our labour costs are probably significantly higher than average. And my pharmacy is located in an economically depressed area, which translate into the inability to charge higher prices,” he said.

Bornstein says his pharmacy will lose $170,000 – or 6.8 per cent – of its annual revenues under the proposed plan. Any amount is difficult to make up in a highly regulated and competitive environment, he says.

Prescriptions, which account for 80 per cent of his sales (and 90 per cent for some independent pharmacies), are highly regulated.

Though he’s allowed an 8-per-cent markup, that margin quickly dwindles if the drug goes through a wholesaler and the customer pays with a credit card, he said.

On brand-name drugs, which account for 75 per cent of the prescriptions he fills, he earns just $2.50 on every $100 sale. (The wholesaler takes 3.5 per cent. The average cost of processing a credit card is 2 per cent.)

The price of everything else in his store, from Band-Aids to Aspirin, is determined by competition from far bigger retailers.

Unlike supermarkets and mass merchants, he can’t use his pharmacy as a loss leader to sell more shampoo, candy or jeans, he says. “I compete against the largest retailer in the world,” he says. (Don’t say Wal-Mart, he asks, mindful of the industry’s desire to appear united against a common foe.)

And it’s not just the immediate financial impact of Premier Dalton McGuinty’s proposed drug reforms that worries Bornstein. It’s also the impact on his future retirement income.

“The value of the pharmacy, what I thought was my nest egg, has gone down to nothing because of Mr. McGuinty,” says the 53-year-old Bornstein.

That leaves him with two options: Cut his costs or start charging for services.

To save $170,000, Bornstein says, he’d have to fire one of his two full-time pharmacists and two of his four technicians.

To fill the gap, he’d have to spend more hours behind the dispensary counter and less time running his business. And he’d still have to close his doors earlier on weeknights and weekends. His store is now open 66 hours a week and at peak times he likes to have more than one pharmacist on duty.

His only other option is to start charging for services, the one thing he says differentiates the independents from larger rivals.

In addition to the personal attention and service his customers get, Bornstein says he provides free delivery even for non-prescription drugs. “I have some shut-ins. If they want a bag of chips and a pop, I deliver it,” he says, with a shrug.

“I really get to practice pharmacy and health care the way I think it should be practiced,” Bornstein says. “People deal with us because of the quality of healthcare we provide.”

Pharmacists are one of the few front-line health care professionals you can see immediately without an appointment, he notes. They take the pressure off the rest of the system, Bornstein says, trying to stick to the careful script he’s prepared on the subject.

But not far below his oft-repeated phrase that “pharmacists are the glue” that is holding a shaky health care system together, he’s clearly mad as hell.

Beside the cash register, Bornstein has posted signs explaining the problem to his customers. They’re invited to protest by emailing their MPP or signing a petition he plans to present to his local MPP, Margarett Best, who also happens to be the minister for health promotion in McGuinty’s government. “How could she stand by and let this happen?”

“Could I have made more money doing something else? Sure I could,” Borstein says. “But I get to do what I love every day.”



PORTRAIT OF A PHARMACY

West Hill Pharmasave

Lawrence Ave. E., Scarborough

Owner: Neil Bornstein

Revenue: $2.5 million a year

Employees: 15

What drug reform will cost: $170,000.

What a pharmacist earns: $45-$50 an hour ($80,000-$90,000 year)

What a pharmacist technician earns: $16-$20 and- hour ($35,000-$40,000 a year.)

How drugs are priced:

On a prescription of $100:

  • Regulated markup to cover the cost of distribution is 8 per cent. Retailer can charge $108.
  • Wholesaler takes 3.5 per cent, or $3.50
  • If the customer pays with a credit card, processing fee is 2 per cent, or $2
  • What’s left for the retailer: $2.50
 

Fw: Pharmacies step up fight with McGuinty by targeting Liberal MPPs ( Globe & Mail)


----- Forwarded by Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 05/04/2010 07:11 AM -----
"Gord Gray" <ggray@mnsi.net>

05/01/2010 06:19 AM

To
<Undisclosed-Recipient:, >
cc
Subject
Pharmacies step up fight with McGuinty by targeting Liberal MPPs ( Globe & Mail)





 

Pharmacies step up fight with McGuinty by targeting Liberal MPPs

Adam Radwanski

From Saturday's Globe and Mail Published on Friday, Apr. 30, 2010 9:30PM

Ontario’s pharmacies are escalating their fight against the Liberal government by aggressively targeting the ridings of 25 MPPs.

For the most part, they are MPPs who are expected to face tight contests in the next provincial election – including several ministers. The aim, according to a source close to the pharmacies’ campaign, is to sow dissent among Dalton McGuinty’s caucus members.

If they’re successful, the pharmacies hope the government will feel compelled to soften its plan to reduce prescription costs by eliminating “professional allowances” – the large sums paid by generic manufacturers to stores in return for selling their products.

The drugstores are clearly sparing no expense.

On Friday, a busload of about 50 pharmacy students departed Queen’s Park, aiming to make two stops in each of the 25 ridings.

Three separate flyers are being sent to every household in each of the constituencies – a total of about three million mailings. Each mentions the local MPP by name, charging that his or her “prescription for your family” is “$750-million in cuts to frontline health care.”

Radio and prints ads similarly call out individual representatives, while encouraging listeners and readers to phone a toll-free number that redirects them to their local constituency offices. To add to the volume, voters are receiving unsolicited calls whether they’re upset by health-care cuts; if they answer in the affirmative, they’re put through to their MPP’s office.

Meanwhile, the Canadian Association of Chain Drug Stores has contracted the polling company Angus Reid to conduct surveys in each of the 25 ridings.

Among other questions, the poll asks whether respondents agree that “cutting local pharmacy hours... would cause difficulty to many people in my community”; that “cutting half-a-billion dollars out of pharmacies is basically a health cut”; and that “if pharmacists were unable to give advice to their patients one-on-one as they do now, it would disproportionately hurt those who seek their advice.”

It also asks whether the local MPP “has a responsibility to speak out and oppose the cut from local pharmacies.” And it wraps up by testing the impact of the issue on voting intentions.

The poll seems to be aimed less at gauging broad public opinion than at testing which of the pharmacies’ messages are taking hold. But it’s likely also intended to put a scare into incumbents, if the results show growing awareness and concern.

Despite the campaign, senior Liberals appear to remain confident. They believe they successfully framed the issue as a matter of lowering drug costs, rather than cutting services, before the industry got its act together. And they don’t think the pharmacies have endeared themselves to the public with aggressive tactics, which included Shoppers Drug Mart cutting store hours in Health Minister Deb Matthews’s hometown of London before the government’s changes had even been implemented.

The Liberals are also confident that their advance work preparing MPPs for the pharmacies’ reaction is helping prevent divisions in caucus. And they think the resolve of Ms. Matthews – who is one of the 25 members being targeted, despite having shown little inclination to bend – is rubbing off on her colleagues.

Still, the pharmacies’ hope is that it will require only a few MPPs to get queasy in order to capture the attention of the people running the next Liberal campaign. And that in turn, they think, will lead to some manner of compromise.

It’s widely believed that the government left itself room for a “give,” in which they’d increase the amount of money coming back to the pharmacies in return for losing the professional allowances. If nothing else, the pharmacies hope to create enough internal pressure to require the Liberals to use it.

 
   

Fw: Early Clips for 05/03/2010


----- Forwarded by Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 05/04/2010 07:09 AM -----
Alex Eliopoulos/CARZ/DCC/DCX

05/03/2010 06:59 AM

To
Calvin R Thudium/CARZ/DCC/DCX@wk-America, Syl D Kucher/CARZ/DCC/DCX@wk-America, Maurice A Labelle/CARZ/DCC/DCX@wk-America
cc
Colin D Marshall/CARZ/DCC/DCX@wk-America, Kelsey Knutson/CARZ/DCC/DCX@wk-America, Rick Traynor/CARZ/DCC/DCX@wk-America
Subject
Fw: Early Clips for 05/03/2010






Thanks,

Alex Eliopoulos
Red Deer Parts Distribution Center
6777 Edgar Industrial Drive
Red Deer, Alberta T4P - 3R2
(403) 343. 5714 Fax: 5744

----- Forwarded by Alex Eliopoulos/CARZ/DCC/DCX on 05/03/2010 06:58 AM -----
Bridget L Crane/HR/DCC/DCX

05/03/2010 06:36 AM

To
cc
Subject
Fw: Early Clips for 05/03/2010












Chrysler Early Clips Headlines (16)

--  Chrysler wins 1st case, tries to settle others  (Automotive News)
--  Software face-off at Chrysler, Switched CAD system would send ripples down supply chain  (Automotive News)
--  Chrysler fights Colo. law  (Automotive News)
--  Men are from Dodge, women are from ...  (Automotive News)
--  Dodge pitches Charger to police  (Automotive News)
--  Cars in 'Full Blown Recovery' As Discounting Aids Sales  (The Wall Street Journal)
--  No new Fiat partners  (Automotive News)
--  GMAC pumps up liquidity to gain share  (Automotive News)
--  Today's GM and Ford: Worlds apart  (Automotive News)
--  Merkel Says Germany Should Be Electric-Car Leader to Aid Climate  (Bloomberg)
--  Who cares what GM did? I do  (Automotive News)
--  Geithner and GM tell a whopper  (Political News Now, Washington Examiner)
--  GM loan story gets more complicated  (Midwest Voices, The Kansas City Star)
--  Geithner sees auto payback  (Automotive News)
--  Toyota discovers silence is golden  (Times Colonist)
--  Mustang out to grab younger buyers, Ford to tout muscle car’s fuel efficiency  (Detroit Free Press)

*Refer to © Notice Below
************************

Automotive News ( 05/03/2010 )
by Neil Roland

 Chrysler wins 1st case, tries to settle others

WASHINGTON -- Even before Chrysler Group learned on Friday that it had won its first dealer arbitration case, the automaker began offering cash settlements to some rejected dealers who are in arbitration. Chrysler is trying to reduce litigation expenses.

Despite the small number of settlement offers reported by dealers, the step was another move away from the company's original hard line on arbitration.

Four Chrysler dealer lawyers and a dealer activist said they know of about 18 closed dealerships that have received offers since Tuesday, April 27.

Most of these offers have been for $25,000, with the range stretching from $20,000 to $200,000, they said. At least half the Chrysler dealers who received offers have rejected them, they say.

"The Chrysler offers are paltry in comparison with what the dealers' businesses were worth, and I expect most to turn them down," said Tammy Darvish, co-leader of a rejected-dealer group called the Committee to Restore Dealer Rights.

Darvish, who is a rejected Chrysler dealer, has filed for arbitration in an attempt to win reinstatement of her Fairfax, Va., and Jacksonville, Fla., stores. Darvish declined to say whether she received an offer.

She and four dealer lawyers said they knew of Chrysler settlement offers to dealers in Illinois, Michigan, California, Florida, West Virginia and Montana.

In a statement, Chrysler said it is making the offers "in an effort to find mutually beneficial alternatives to dealer arbitrations, to reduce the costs of litigation and to protect the existing dealer network."

The company added: "Resolving cases below anticipated litigation expenses makes good business sense."

Chrysler declined to say how many settlement offers it has made or the amount of compensation offered.

Mark Lyman, a Chicago lawyer who represents a rejected Chrysler dealership in arbitration, said it makes economic sense for the company to offer settlements.

Chrysler's expenses for a single arbitration may exceed $100,000 when fees for lawyers and expert witnesses are taken into account, Lyman estimated.

But Chrysler's offers fail to take into account dealers' perceptions of what their closed stores were worth, he said.

"There's very little incentive for dealers at this stage to accept Chrysler's offers," Lyman said. "The only circumstance where it makes sense for a dealer is someone whose tolerance for arbitration has been exhausted. But I don't know any dealers who feel that way."

In March, Chrysler offered to reinstate 50 closed dealerships out of the 387 that had filed for arbitration.

In contrast, GM has offered to reinstate 666 of the 1,160 dealerships in arbitration -- while offering to discuss possible settlements with the remainder.

GM's settlement offers have gone beyond compensation to include reinstatement hinging on dealership upgrades, store moves and sales goal achievement.

Lyman said Chrysler's arbitration tab could hit tens of millions of dollars -- at a time when the automaker is trying to get back on its feet after bankruptcy.

That makes a compelling case for the company to come up with settlement offers that are more attractive to dealers.

Said Lyman: "Chrysler may just be testing the waters now to see what dealers' tolerance is."

Arbitration tally

Of the 1,574 arbitration filings by GM and Chrysler dealers

• 797 cases withdrawn or closed

• 99 cases on hold

• 10 hearings held in April

• 267 hearings scheduled in May

• 227 hearings scheduled June 1-14

• 130 hearings scheduled June 15-30

• 25 hearings scheduled July 1-14

• 62 hearings not yet scheduled

Note: Total exceeds 1,574 because of double counting of multiday hearings scheduled at end of one month and beginning of another.

Source: American Arbitration Association

Read more:
http://www.autonews.com/article/20100503/RETAIL07/305039947#ixzz0mrZxTj6Q

Copyright (C) 2007 Crain Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2007 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC (trading as Factiva). All rights reserved. 



************************

Automotive News ( 05/03/2010 )
by David Barkholz

 Software face-off at Chrysler, Switched CAD system would send ripples down supply chain

Sergio Marchionne's plan to meld the engineering operations at Fiat S.p.A. and Chrysler Group is spurring a battle between two software giants over whose products will be used to create Chrysler cars and trucks.

The battle has multimillion-dollar implications that will ripple down through the supply chain.

For 20 years, Chrysler has used CATIA, which replaced drafting boards for engineers designing parts, subsystems and vehicles. Those digital designs also are the basis for testing parts and creating the tools and dies used by factories. Other users of CATIA, a product of global giant Dassault Systemes of Paris, include Honda Motor Co. and Daimler AG.

But Fiat uses a competitor, Siemens PLM's NX software. So do General Motors Co. and Nissan Motor Co.

Marchionne, CEO of both Fiat and Chrysler, aims to phase out Dassault and integrate Siemens PLM for design software over several years as Chrysler introduces new platforms, said a source familiar with the plan.

But Dassault plans to fight to hold onto Chrysler, one of its premier customers, a Dassault executive responsible for Chrysler sales said.

At stake are software sales and licensing pacts for thousands of computerized work stations -- and not just at Chrysler.

Suppliers have to hook into these companies' systems. A switch in software suppliers would affect engineers at thousands of Chrysler suppliers because of the need for the automaker and its suppliers to share engineering designs.

Spokeswomen for Chrysler and Siemens PLM, a U.S. arm of the German company, declined to comment.

Computer-aided design is the use of three-dimensional software to design and engineer parts and simulate their use in vehicles and the processes needed for production.

Managing that process, from design through engineering and manufacturing, is called product lifecycle management.

CATIA is short for Computer-Aided Three Dimensional Interactive Application.

Already, Fiat has broken the monopoly that Dassault's CATIA software held at Chrysler.

The Italian automaker is requiring the use of NX computer-aided-design software for the North American revisions being made to the Fiat 500 and the powertrain for the minicar that will be built in Mexico, the source said.

As part of Fiat 500 development, Fiat also has introduced Siemens PLM software that captures product-development data, the source said. Until that recent introduction of Siemens PLM's Teamcenter software, Dassault's Enovia software had ruled that domain at Chrysler as well.

Robert Brincheck, Dassault's client executive for Chrysler, acknowledges that Chrysler is now using rival software for Fiat 500 design.

He said a "political struggle is going on" at Chrysler whether to unify on one CAD software or allow CATIA and NX to co-exist. Ford Motor Co., for example, uses CATIA for design software but uses Siemens PLM products as well.

But Brincheck said Dassault remains the dominant player at Chrysler.

And the company intends to fight to participate on all future Chrysler vehicle programs, including platforms brought to Chrysler by Fiat, he said.

"Actually, CATIA usage at Chrysler has increased in the past year," Brincheck said.

He said Chrysler has been adding designers and engineers in recent months as Fiat and Chrysler hustle to jointly develop new vehicles.

Marchionne re-emphasized last week the carmakers will undertake a unified product-development process that will give Chrysler access to Fiat's small-car technology and Fiat access to Chrysler's truck and large-car expertise.

CATIA has been a linchpin in Chrysler product designs since the late 1980s, Brincheck said.

The software traces its heritage to Dassault Aviation of Paris, where engineers interested in aerodynamics developed the product in the 1960s.

Chrysler was a pioneer of CATIA's use in the U.S. auto industry, Brincheck said. Today CATIA is a fixture in the auto and aerospace industries, with Dassault Systemes touting 8,000 CATIA customers.

Siemens PLM is the other leader in the industry, along with Parametric Technology Corp., with its Pro/ENGINEER software.

GM is Siemens PLM's largest and one of its longest-running customers. GM has used the software for years, going back to when the software was known as Unigraphics and owned by EDS.

Siemens PLM acquired UGS Corp. in 2007 and began marketing the software as NX.

The battle may spill over beyond Chrysler. Brincheck said Dassault is pitching CATIA and its suite of design software to GM.

What happened?

-- Chrysler, suppliers use CATIA design software for 20 years.

-- Fiat, which uses rival software, takes control of Chrysler.

-- Fiat/Chrysler CEO Marchionne plans to shift Chrysler away from CATIA.

Read more:
http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100503/OEM01/305039958/1143#ixzz0mrakKGfm

Copyright (C) 2007 Crain Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2007 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC (trading as Factiva). All rights reserved. 



************************

Automotive News ( 05/03/2010 )
by Neil Roland

 Chrysler fights Colo. law

WASHINGTON -- Chrysler Group is asking the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to block a Colorado dealer reinstatement law, arguing the law is pre-empted by bankruptcy laws.

The law requires Chrysler and General Motors Co. to offer a rejected dealership the right of first refusal if the automaker wants to reopen a point in the rejected dealer's market. If the automaker has awarded such a franchise, it must offer to reinstate the rejected dealership or compensate it. In December, Chrysler challenged similar laws enacted by Illinois, Oregon, Maine and North Carolina. North Carolina backed off enforcement in a settlement with Chrysler. Illinois, Oregon and Maine are contesting the challenge.

Read more:
http://www.autonews.com/article/20100503/RETAIL07/305039959#ixzz0mraEJBN0

Copyright (C) 2007 Crain Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2007 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC (trading as Factiva). All rights reserved. 



************************

Automotive News ( 05/03/2010 )


 Men are from Dodge, women are from ...

Dodge's Super Bowl commercial, called "Man's Last Stand," may not have turned around sales of the struggling brand, but it certainly has generated plenty of chatter -- and a few parodies.

The commercial, created by Dodge's new ad agency, Wieden+Kennedy, showed a series of weary, resigned-looking men staring blankly at the camera as a voiceover speaks of the sacrifices men make to make relationships work.

One example: "I will put the seat down."

The ad ended with the voice saying: "Because I do these things, I will drive the car I want," as a Hemi roars to life and a Dodge Charger surges forward on a highway.

A parody, or rather several of them, have turned up on Youtube.com. "Woman's Last Stand" showed a bunch of weary women talking about the sacrifices they make for their relationships.

A few choice lines: "I will put my career on hold to raise your children. I will make 75 cents for every dollar you make to do the same job. I will see Paul Blart Mall Cop twice. I will watch Super Bowl commercials that depict men as emasculated and oppressed."

Read more:
http://www.autonews.com/article/20100503/RETAIL03/305039964#ixzz0mrZlDtoJ

Copyright (C) 2007 Crain Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2007 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC (trading as Factiva). All rights reserved. 



************************

Automotive News ( 05/03/2010 )
by Brad Wernle

 Dodge pitches Charger to police

DETROIT -- Chrysler Group will boost efforts to market the Dodge Charger to police departments, part of a larger drive to sell more vehicles to government and commercial fleets, said Peter Grady, Chrysler's top dealers executive.

"We plan on going after the police market pretty hard," Grady, the Chrysler vice president in charge of fleet sales, said in a speech to the NAFA Fleet Management Association expo here. The re-engineered 2011 Charger is scheduled to arrive in the fourth quarter.

Chrysler plans to cap its sales to rental fleets, says Peter Grady.

Chrysler will cap sales to rental car fleets in order to concentrate more on government and commercial fleet sales, Grady said. Chrysler has leaned on less profitable sales to rental fleets too heavily in the past, a practice that has hurt residual values. Chrysler is refocusing its fleet business on the government and commercial sectors in an effort to preserve residual values and strengthen brands, Grady said.

Dealer sources said fleet sales spiked in the first quarter, accounting for 58 percent of total Chrysler sales. Grady called the fleet market "overheated" because many rental companies replaced high-mileage vehicles.

Grady predicted fleet sales would normalize at 2.1 million units in an 11 million unit industry for this year, or about 18 percent. Chrysler has set a goal of 25 percent sales to fleets.

Chrysler's alliance with Fiat opens new opportunities to fleets because, he said, Fiat is strong in compressed natural gas technology.

Read more:
http://www.autonews.com/article/20100503/RETAIL03/305039974#ixzz0mraPg2wP

Copyright (C) 2007 Crain Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2007 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC (trading as Factiva). All rights reserved. 



************************

The Wall Street Journal ( 05/03/2010 )
by Sharon Terlep

 Cars in 'Full Blown Recovery' As Discounting Aids Sales

DETROIT -- U.S. auto sales continued to climb last month as the stabilizing economy and attractive discounts brought more consumers into showrooms.

Monthly sales totals, are expected to come in Monday at a seasonally adjusted rate of 11.3 million cars and light trucks, according to people familiar with the figures.

That would be slightly less than the 11.78 million vehicles sold in March, but it would be a clear increase from the year-earlier level of 9.72 million vehicles sold.

The seasonally adjusted annual rate for the first quarter as a whole was 11 million vehicles.

"The automotive industry is in a full-blown recovery," Jesse Toprak, an analyst at TrueCar Inc. said in a written statement.

TrueCar, which is based in Santa Monica, Calif., and tracks U.S. auto sales and prices, said it believes the monthly sales pace will surpass 12 million vehicles by summer.

Several auto makers reported substantial sales gains in April, according to data from analysts and people familiar with the figures.

Ford Motor Co. is on track for an increase of about 25% from a year earlier, these people said.

Nissan Motor Co. could report an even greater increase and be the industry's biggest leader. Some analysts predict Nissan will report sales growth of 50% or more for April.

General Motors Co. is likely to see a gain of around 5%, modest in part because it has phased out its Pontiac, Saturn and Hummer brands and sold Saab, which helped boost sales a year earlier.

Chrysler Group LLC, which struggled with sales declines in the first quarter, is expected to report a rise in April, perhaps of 10% or more, analysts said.

The total was given a boost by significant sales to fleet customers, such as rental-car companies, people familiar with the matter said.

Sales have been spurred by higher sales incentives. Toyota Motor Corp., for example, increased incentives in March to halt a slide in sales stemming from its recall and quality troubles.

It then extended the deals into April and recently told dealers in parts of the U.S. that it would continue the effort into this month.

(Copyright (c) 2007, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
© 2007 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC (trading as Factiva). All rights reserved.



************************

Automotive News ( 05/03/2010 )


 No new Fiat partners

MILAN, Italy -- Fiat S.p.A. "doesn't need" partners beyond its alliance with Chrysler Group, Fiat Chairman John Elkann said.

Elkann, who was appointed chairman last week, said Fiat is focused on turning around Chrysler, Bloomberg reported. "Fiat doesn't need other partners," Elkann said on the sidelines of the annual meeting of Exor S.p.A., the Agnelli family company that owns the largest stake in Fiat.

Elkann, 34, the grandson of former Fiat Chairman Giovanni Agnelli, said, "We have a strong relationship with Chrysler, and that is what we are actively working on."

Read more:
http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100503/OEM02/100439983#ixzz0mraZM1pi

Copyright (C) 2007 Crain Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2007 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC (trading as Factiva). All rights reserved. 



************************

Automotive News ( 05/03/2010 )
by Donna Harris

 GMAC pumps up liquidity to gain share

GMAC Financial Services has raised $18.1 billion through a variety of nongovernment sources since last fall in a drive to go after market share.

The latest jolt: Ally Bank, GMAC's retail banking subsidiary, obtained a $7 billion revolving credit line with a syndicate of lenders. The funds will be used to expand GMAC's commercial and retail loan and lease business, says spokeswoman Gina Proia.

The revolving credit line -- which matures within a year -- is a first for Ally Bank, said GMAC Treasurer Jeffrey Brown in a statement. The funding "further strengthens and diversifies its liquidity sources," Brown said.

GMAC raised about $3.9 billion in unsecured debt to date in 2010 and earlier this month launched a debt offering in Europe. Ally Bank sold $3.6 billion in auto loan securities to U.S. investors since September and $3.6 billion in auto loan securities to investors in Canada in the first quarter of 2010.

At the end of 2009, Ally Bank also had $29.9 billion in deposits.

The U.S. Treasury Department has invested more than $16 billion in GMAC since December 2008 and had a 56 percent stake in the company as of last December.

Sid DeBoer is CEO of publicly held Lithia Motors Inc., which has a large concentration of Chrysler Group and General Motors stores. DeBoer says GMAC began competing aggressively for the retail finance business in the fourth quarter last year, though it still lags in commercial finance.

For years, GMAC was the nation's highest-volume retail auto lender. But GMAC slid into second place behind Toyota Financial Services in 2008 and into fifth-place in 2009, according to Experian Automotive's AutoCount rankings of the top automotive lenders.

As GMAC expanded its access to funds late last year, it increased its share of the retail finance business. In the fourth quarter, GMAC ranked third on Experian's list of the nation's top lenders.

Read more:
http://www.autonews.com/article/20100503/RETAIL02/305039986#ixzz0mrb0QcLP

Copyright (C) 2007 Crain Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2007 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC (trading as Factiva). All rights reserved. 



************************

Automotive News ( 05/03/2010 )
by Keith Crain

 Today's GM and Ford: Worlds apart

General Motors announced last month that it is paying off government loans. A few days later, Ford reported profits of more than $2 billion for the first quarter.

What a study in contrasts.

Ford never borrowed money from the government, so today the company still owes more than $30 billion to lenders. Ford needs to pay it back and service the debt. This is not an insignificant challenge.

GM went bankrupt, which wiped out all its debt. GM's bondholders lost billions. Then the new GM borrowed $6.7 billion from the U.S. government and $1.4 billion from the Canadian government -- on top of $50 billion in aid from the U.S. government, for which GM swapped 61 percent of its equity.

GM didn't need the $8.1 billion in loans, so the automaker gave it back early in three payments. This is a significant achievement.

GM could have taken the Ford route and mortgaged the company a few years ago but chose not to do it.

GM is seeing small improvements in North America after eliminating four brands along with much of its dealer network.

For GM, China is booming.

Ford has sold more vehicles, increased market share and is introducing models that the public seems to want in large volumes.

Ford seems to be repeating the success of a couple of decades ago, when the company cut costs like crazy, introduced the Taurus and watched profits skyrocket for several years.

Ford appears ready to enjoy that same kind of success in the second decade of this century.

GM, particularly in North America, seems to understand its mission: Design, engineer and build cars and trucks that customers want to buy. It won't happen overnight.

GM must be patient if it expects to do an initial public offering and raise anywhere near enough money to repay the U.S. government's $50 billion.

The two companies are a study in contrasts and style.

Ford seems on the right track with only the normal challenges of an extremely volatile economy.

GM will need far more patience to understand a complex business. Mark Reuss is the right guy for the spot.

Meanwhile, Chrysler is becoming more intertwined with Fiat -- for better or worse.

The domestic market has never been more complicated. It will be fascinating to watch the winners and the losers -- today and tomorrow.

Read more:
http://www.autonews.com/article/20100503/OEM01/305039996#ixzz0mrZaScFt

Copyright (C) 2007 Crain Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2007 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC (trading as Factiva). All rights reserved. 



************************

Bloomberg ( 05/03/2010 )
by Aaron Kirchfeld

 Merkel Says Germany Should Be Electric-Car Leader to Aid Climate

Chancellor Angela Merkel said Germany should become the market leader in electric vehicles to help climate protection.

Germany aims to have one million electric cars on its streets by 2020, helped by investments in research and development, Merkel said in her video podcast.

Merkel also stressed the importance of reaching an agreement on climate protection at a UN conference in Mexico at the end of the year, according to a press release about the podcast.

©2007 Bloomberg L.P.



************************

Automotive News ( 05/03/2010 )


 Who cares what GM did? I do

To the Editor:

Executive Editor Edward Lapham's Friday segments on Automotive News TV generally hit the mark, and I look forward to them.

But his comments on the April 23 newscast regarding "What is Normal?" were so far off the mark -- i.e., "So who cares if GM did it by robbing Peter to pay Paul?" -- I have to comment.

GM took money it had borrowed from the Troubled Asset Relief Program out of an account held in escrow and made a payment. Then it went on TV saying, "Thank you," making it seem like it was repaying the loan in full and out of earnings in order to sell product and grease the slide for its upcoming stock sale.

Sorry, Ed, no "good job" on this one.

JOSEPH R. PUGIA SR., CEO, Leader Transits LLC, Boxford, Mass.

Read more: http://www.autonews.com/article/20100503/OEM01/100429803#ixzz0mrZOPeUK

Copyright (C) 2007 Crain Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2007 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC (trading as Factiva). All rights reserved. 



************************

Political News Now, Washington Examiner ( 05/02/2010 )


 Geithner and GM tell a whopper

Special Inspector General for the Troubled Assets Relief Program Neil Barofsky testifies on the financial crisis and TARP program on Capitol Hill. (Harry Hamburg/AP)

Here’s a multiple-choice test that should be of particular interest to taxpayers, professors of business ethics and the fraudulent advertising complaints department at the Federal Trade Commission: Which of the following statements is true?

A. If frogs had wings, they could fly.

B. I did not have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.

C. We have repaid our government loans in full, with interest, five years ahead of schedule.

D. There’s gold in them thar hills.

Implausible, perhaps, but yes, if frogs had wings, then it is conceivable they could fly. And if one accepts Mr. Clinton’s novel understanding of what the meaning of “is” is, then his familiar statement of denial about his relationship with a White House intern is true. And there is no doubt that somewhere on God’s green Earth there are still hills in which there is gold to be found.

Statement C is being repeated daily in a national advertising campaign featuring General Motors Chairman Ed Whitacre. (He is referring to $49.5 billion the Treasury Department gave GM in last year’s bailout. In return, Treasury got a 60.8 percent common equity stake in GM, $2.1 billion in preferred stock and $7.1 billion in GM debt.)

Whitacre sounds convincing in a down-home sort of way in the TV spot, but the reality is that this statement is a blatant misrepresentation. And Whitacre knows it. He’s probably not worried about that fact, however, because it was endorsed by none other than Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner, who issued a supportive statement saying, “We are encouraged that GM has repaid its debt well ahead of schedule and confident that the company is on a strong path to viability.”



************************

Midwest Voices, The Kansas City Star ( 05/02/2010 )


 GM loan story gets more complicated

General Motors’ announcement that it had paid back $6.7 billion in government loans was welcome news for the embattled automaker, which employs 3,500 workers at the Fairfax plant in Kansas City, Kan.

Alas, the news wasn’t as reassuring as it first appeared.

And GM’s chief executive, Ed Whitacre, is rightly facing criticism for misleading consumers in a TV ad bragging about the matter.

It turns out the loan wasn’t repaid with GM earnings. Rather, it came from a government-created escrow account maintained by the Treasury under the Troubled Assets Relief Program, or TARP.

TARP Inspector General Neil Barofsky said the repayment is still “good news,” because it means GM doesn’t need that money.

Still, Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley, a Republican, branded the maneuver “an elaborate TARP money shuffle” and wrote to the Treasury Department seeking an explanation. Treasury replied that it was “public knowledge that GM would use these specific funds to repay the … loans, if it did not otherwise need them for expenses.”

In the TV ad, Whitacre boasted that GM had “repaid our government loan, in full, with interest, five years ahead of the original schedule.” The ad doesn’t mention that the repayment proceeds came from another government account, or that $50 billion in federal aid had been converted to GM stock and taxpayers could still lose that investment.

GM appears to be climbing out of its financial hole, although the climb may be a bit slower than Whitacre’s ad suggests; its financial reports over the next few months will tell the tale. But GM’s recent ad left out key facts, and in the minds of many consumers may have damaged its credibility.

Read more:
http://voices.kansascity.com/node/8836#ixzz0mrVLkhcQ



************************

Automotive News ( 05/03/2010 )


 Geithner sees auto payback

WASHINGTON -- U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said taxpayers are still at risk of losses on investments in General Motors Co. and Chrysler Group, but he cited a "reasonable chance" that all the aid may be recouped, Reuters reported.

Geithner, testifying last week before a Senate subcommittee, said he was aware of concerns over GM's claims in a commercial that it has repaid its government loans and that he wanted to be clear that there was still risk of taxpayer losses on equity holdings in GM and Chrysler.

Said Geithner: "We still have substantial equity investments left in those companies, and, as a result, some risk of loss, although a fraction of what we feared."

Read more:
http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100503/OEM02/305039957/1429#ixzz0mrWGvFUM

Copyright (C) 2007 Crain Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2007 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC (trading as Factiva). All rights reserved. 



************************

Times Colonist ( 04/29/2010 )
by Derek McNaughton

 Toyota discovers silence is golden

Listen. Bend a little closer. Closer still, it’s still very faint. Can you hear it now? I know it’s hard — it’s just a whisper, after all — but considering the deafening roar that has been the litany of Toyota recalls these last six months, it’s the sound of a seismic shift in policy from the corporate giant.

Toyota has just gone through another rough patch on its way to brand rehabilitation, yet this time there has been a complete absence of the allegations of cover-ups and corporate obfuscation that seemed to follow all previous revelations. That lack of recriminations is the sound of public relations working. It is the sound of the world’s largest automaker finally accepting responsibility with a minimum of fuss.

To wit, Toyota has agreed to pay a record US$16.4-million in fines for failing to disclose to the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) its knowledge regarding the sticky pedals affected in its recent recall of 2.3 million cars. Oh, sure, Toyota denied the NHTSA’s allegation “that it violated the Safety Act or its implementing regulations.”

But, it seemed more like a pro forma reaction. In reality, the company finally determined what most of us would have thought an obvious truth — that simply paying the fine is far easier than digging in for a protracted battle that media and consumers alike have already determined is lost. Besides, with this debacle already said to have cost Toyota as much as $2-billion, the NHTSA’s fine is quite literally chicken feed.

Even more indicative of Toyota’s new-found “silence is golden” attitude is the company’s reaction to the news that the influential Consumer Reports magazine issued a “Don’t Buy” for Lexus’s new GX 460 for safety reasons (reportedly the first such warning in almost a decade). CR blamed the warning on the big ute’s propensity for lift-off oversteer — something the computerized onboard stability control should have corrected — and noted that such misbehaviour could cause rollovers (the consumer advocacy group did, however, point out that it was not aware of any GX 460s rolling over).

Instead of the denials that have surrounded previous allegations of malfunctions or delaying action as it waits for its own engineers to study the problem, Toyota Canada immediately suspended sales of the GX and offered the 149 Canadians who have already taken delivery of the luxury SUV alternate loaner cars. It’s difficult to argue with such an unqualified solution to a problem, especially when it’s accompanied by a total lack of strident denials. Or, as Josh Billings (America’s second most famous humorist of the 19th century after Mark Twain) said, “Silence is one of the hardest arguments to refute.” Ditto recent recalls of the Sienna, Tundra and Highlander.

It’s been a hard lesson for Toyota on how to deal with safety issues/recalls/accusations seemingly without cessation. And, although Toyota Canada was perfectly right in recently noting that the floor mat problems that plagued American Camrys et al were not an issue here, the company still mishandled the issue. Certainly, reminding MPs investigating Toyota’s disclosure of the recalls that the company was not obligated to inform the federal government of any complaints is not the stuff of positive public relations.

Nor are such admissions, while technically true, likely to gain the confidence of consumers shaken by Toyota’s rapid fall from grace. Indeed, way back in January, Irv Miller, Toyota U.S.A.’s vice-president of environmental and public affairs, recommended a complete mea culpa regarding the sticky gas pedal issue. “We are not protecting our customers by keeping this quiet. The time to hide on this one is over,” Miller said in a January 16 email obtained by the Detroit Free Press that was among the 70,000 pages of documents collected by NHTSA as part of its investigation into the unintended acceleration issue.

The email, according to the Free Press, was in response to another Toyota public relations executive advising that, “We should not mention” the accelerator pedal failures because “we have not clarified the real cause” and mechanical failures “might raise another uneasiness of customers.”

Considering how utterly and completely Toyota’s actions failed to quell the unease of its customers, I can think of no stronger proof that traditional public relations “spin” was a key factor in extending and magnifying the company’s woes. And that Toyota Canada’s recent policies — while just the start of a process that will hopefully see its brand rehabilitated — are a step in the right direction.

Read more:
http://www.timescolonist.com/Toyota+discovers+silence+golden/2967199/story.html#ixzz0mrV0aYdR



************************

Detroit Free Press ( 05/03/2010 )
by BRENT SNAVELY

 Mustang out to grab younger buyers, Ford to tout muscle car’s fuel efficiency

The muscle car war between Ford and General Motors is to rev up this month as Ford’s 2011 Mustangs reach more dealerships and as Ford launches an advertising campaign aimed at younger buyers.

Ford said the marketing campaign for Mustang will feature a heavy dose of social media and Internet marketing, as well as TV commercials that include an appearance by the new 2011 DUB Edition Mustang that Ford is announcing today. The DUB Edition Mustang drew inspiration from a Mustang custom built for hip-hop star Nelly and is a collaboration between Ford, DUB and Roush Industries.

The 305-horsepower DUB Edition will sport 20-inch TIS Wheels and Pirelli tires, and will be available as a coupe, convertible or with a glass roof by fall.

The DUB Edition is just one version of Ford’s new 2011 Mustang lineup, which includes either a 3.7-liter V6 engine with 305 horsepower or a 5.0-liter V8 engine with 412 horsepower. In a break from the past, Ford plans to heavily market Mustang’s V6 engine rather than the V8 and tout fuel efficiency, said Steve Ling, Ford’s North American car marketing manager.

“It’s all about the V6,” Ling said, because it will get 31 miles per gallon on the highway. “The 3.7-liter engine really opens Mustang up to a broader audience.”

Ford said its marketing will target younger enthusiasts and women.

The battle for sales supremacy between the Mustang and Camaro resumed in March 2009 when GM brought back the Camaro after a nearly seven- year hiatus.

Last year, Camaro fell less than 5,000 short of outselling Mustang, despite being on the market for fewer months.

From January through March 2010, Chevrolet sold 20,157 Camaros while Ford sold 15,691 Mustangs.

Ling said excitement about Mustang’s new engines ratcheted up preorders for the 2011 Mustang to about three times last year’s preorders.

“We’re feeling very good about where the Mustang sales are going to be,” Ling said.

(c) Copyright 2007, Detroit Free Press. All Rights Reserved.
© 2007 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC (trading as Factiva). All rights reserved.